Nigrescence Model of Racial Identity Development Essay -- Psychology

In 1971, William E. flummox, Jr., Ph.D., a downhearted psychologist and prominent researcher (specializing in Black psychology) armed a role model for assessing how pitch opprobriousness Americans come to understand what it means to be Black. Dr. Cross introduced his ideologies as the Nigrescence Model of Racial Identity Development. He asserts that every swart American must undergo a series of identity element stages to develop a healthy and balanced understanding of the Black experience and fabricate well-rounded in our global society. This model encompasses five stages of identity development, which Dr. Cross emphasizes, must be performed in order to successfully accomplish this goal. The outgrowth stage of Black racial identity development refers to the pre-encounter stage. This depicts the juncture in life when a black American displays a lack sensation of his/her own race and is uninterested in racial differences (to include those that bear upon Blacks). This stage d elineates two types of identities, namely the anti-Black and assimilation bundle ups. The anti-Black pre-encounter stage represents a cluster of black Americans that take pride in snow-clad standards, values, and beliefs they view the White race and culture as emblems of beauty and perfection. These people hold a high level of hatred for the Black race and openly elicites their vox populi on the matter. In contrast, the assimilation pre-encounter stage represents a cluster of black Americans that exhibits low salience for being Black. This cluster does not blatantly express hate for the Black race, however, they prefer to identify themselves with being something other than black Americans. They embrace color blindness and maintain a race-neutral demeanor towards humanity. Whether class within ... ...of many concepts forwarded by academicians that inaccurately assesses identity development. Dr. Cross conceptualized theories ar oversimplified, as they implicate all black Americ ans as unified in their upbringing family structure values systems, beliefs, economic status, level of education, and exposures to racial flatness which is clearly inaccurate. Simplistic models of this sort exclude an individuals experiential background, which provides important variables to consider when assessing ones comprehension of what it means to be black. Further, Dr. Cross model failed to explicate a connection between identity and psychological functions. It is vitally important that we suspend these types conceptual theories that label and carve up our experiences, and develop accurate psychological theories that encompasses all variables that makes us who we are.