Module 3: Drug Essay

Are drug companies that probe experimental drugs in foreign countries acting honorablely? In my opinion, a lot of deal in foreign countries are uneducated and therefore, whitethorn non fully understand the put on the lines, complications and locating effect of these experimental drugs. If they do not have the means to adequately research the drug previous to testing it, they may end up doing so without fully ground what potential side effects are affect. I am not sure how well companies educate these foreign countries and or commonwealth involved in the case study. If these people are not educated decently than it is unethical for them to test experimental drugs on them. Is the Statesn industry at too much bump of lawsuits to remain competitive? Should companies try to receive drugs be given prerogative from lawsuits? The American industry is at risk for lawsuits. I believe people sue now days for roughly anything. However, it is not too much of a risk to remain compet itive.America is one of the richest countries in the world. I feel China is our biggest competition. We must inhabit to advance our technology, enhance our products and services and look for new ideas and inventions in shape to remain competitive. There will always be a risk of lawsuits but I do not feel is would stop us from being competitive. Companies trying to develop drugs should not be given immunity from lawsuits. I know that by developing and inventing new drugs, companies are trying to remain competitive and find cures or medicines to help people. However, or so of the side effects that are related to these drugs are horrendous and can private road permanent damage. I also understand that most side effects are disclosed to people who take these new drugs until now not all side effects are known with these new drugs and some of them can lead to death. It may not be the companys intention to ca purpose death or some other vindicatory deficiency but it happens and when it does, the individual should have to right to sue for medical exam related termss and pain and weathering. Is it ethical for companies to decline to remove a useful drug because they can make to a greater extent gold marketing drugs that are more widely needed? Is it ethical for companies to decline to sell a useful drug in a foreign area because they can make more money marketing the drug elsewhere? I personally feel that it is neither ethical nor unethical for a company to decline to sell a useful drug just because they can make more money marketing drugs that are more widely needed.It really is up to the company what drugs they indispensability to sellhowever if a drug is procurable that will help people and or cure disease, it should be made available and companies should sell it. From a strain stand point I can understand why they would want to market only drugs that are more widely needed as it will make them more money however by whirl or sell drugs that are us eful, they will eventually gain more recognition and that could lead to a competitive advantage. As for whether or not it is ethical for companies to decline selling a useful drug in a foreign country because they can make more money marketing the drug elsewhere, I am again neither in agreement or disagreement on this one. It is a companys chose where and to whom they want to sell drugs to. However, in poor countries, people cannot easily give in anything. Companies would have to reduce their price significantly even by selling in bulk. If they sell to China or other countries that can soften the drugs, I am sure they would do so but they also risk losing money.Do companies have an ethical obligation to make drugs available in poor countries at humble or no cost? I personally feel that companies do not have an ethical obligation to make drugs available in poor countries at minute or no cost. I certainly can understand that people in other countries have it very hard. A lot of pe ople have little or no money and can yet afford to feed their family and or children let alone afford health care and or drugs. However, by making drugs available at little to no cost, people will be able to sell it and use it illegally creating an even bigger problem. People will smuggle it into the unite States as they do now with street drugs. It is unfortunate that people with superb intentions who will use the drugs and or medication for what it is prescribe for have to suffer because of those people whose intentions are not so good. Those free and or alienated cost drugs will be another way for criminals to make money. I do not think it is a good idea nor do I feel that companies have any type of moral or ethical obligation to do this.